With a quick vote
last month, the International
Astronomical Union decreed that
Pluto
was no longer the ninth
planet,
but just a
dwarf planet
— and not even the largest dwarf —
orbiting in a distant ring of icy
debris.
Cornell Capa/Time Life Pictures, via
Getty Images
Gerard Kuiper, shown in 1948, speculated
about the belt's existence in 1951.
But perhaps that should not be seen as a slight to Pluto.
For many astronomers, that ring of icy debris, known as the
Kuiper Belt, has become an exciting spot
for innovative research and has changed
how they view the solar system.
“It’s a lot bigger now,” said Marc W. Buie, an astronomer
at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff,
Ariz. “For me, it’s like somebody
invented a new field of science.”
Harold F. Levison of the space studies department in the
Southwest Research Institute in Boulder,
Colo., said, “The more we learn, the
weirder it looks.”
More than 1,100 Kuiper Belt objects have been found so far.
Astronomers estimate that half a million
bodies larger than 20 miles wide are
floating out there. At least one appears
to be mostly rock with a coating of ice.
Some are mostly ice. Some are less dense
than ice, indicating a Swiss-cheese-like
structure. A surprising number of them
have moons.
Some move in clockwork with Neptune; Pluto, for example, is
in what is called a 3:2 resonance,
taking 1.5 times as long as Neptune to
loop the Sun. Many Kuiper Belt objects
have been flung into orbits crazily
tilted to the rest of the solar system.
“This is really a very exotic zoo out there,” said S. Alan
Stern, executive director of the space
science and engineering division at the
Southwest Research Institute and
principal investigator of
NASA’s
New Horizon spacecraft, which is
currently heading to Pluto.
The distribution of Kuiper Belt objects has already
provided decisive evidence that Neptune
was once perhaps nearly a billion miles
closer to the Sun and was then
gravitationally nudged outward.
Astronomers also hope that the Kuiper
Belt preserves a frozen record of the
earliest building materials of the solar
system.
“It’s kind of like the solar system’s attic,” Dr. Stern
said. “It’s like an archaeological dig
into the history of our solar system.”
Scientists had initially expected a simple structure for
the belt: a thin disk of objects
traveling in circular orbits in the
plane of the solar system. Some Kuiper
Belt objects do fit that profile, and
those are called the classical Kuiper
Belt objects. (One mystery is why there
appears to be a sharp edge at about 4.5
billion miles, with no classical Kuiper
Belt objects beyond that distance. Some
think a passing star did that.)
Other Kuiper Belt objects share orbits similar to Pluto’s,
in resonance with Neptune. Those in the
same 3:2 resonance as Pluto have been
called the Plutinos.
Still others are called the scattered-disk Kuiper Belt
objects. These appear to have been
tossed into highly elliptical orbits,
often at a sharp angle to the rest of
the solar system. Surprisingly, these
include some of the larger Kuiper Belt
objects, including 2003 UB313, nicknamed
Xena, which is larger than Pluto.
An estimated 15 percent of Kuiper Belt objects are binaries
— pairs of bodies of similar size and
mass. Among some classical Kuiper Belt
objects, that fraction may be as high as
30 percent — possibly higher, because
even the Hubble Space Telescope cannot
distinguish two separate objects if they
are too close to each other.
Theorists puzzled about how such small bodies, with weak
gravitational pull, could have paired up
so often. The answer, it turns out, is
that as two objects flew past each
other, the gravitational drag generated
by many other much smaller Kuiper Belt
objects slowed them enough to capture
each other.
That mechanism requires a fairly dense Kuiper Belt with a
total mass of at least 10 Earths. But
while Kuiper Belt objects are many, they
do not amount to much today. Adding the
masses of Pluto, Xena and the half
million other objects, even those not
yet seen, gives an estimate of just
one-tenth the mass of Earth.
“The mass we measure is pathetic,” said David C. Jewitt, a
professor of astronomy at the
University
of Hawaii.
That, in turn, produces a quandary. Where has 99 percent of
the Kuiper Belt gone? This is, as the
planetary scientists quaintly put it,
the cleanup problem. (One popular idea:
repeated collisions smashed most of them
to dusty bits, and the bits were blown
away by solar radiation.)
Just 15 years ago, the Kuiper Belt was not on the map at
all. The known solar system essentially
ended at Neptune, except for the
occasional comet interloper from far
away. (Fifteen years ago, Pluto was
traveling along the inner part of its
eccentric orbit, closer to the Sun than
Neptune.)
Continue>>